-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 334
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: slashing todos #880
test: slashing todos #880
Conversation
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Approving, refactor is clean.
// Get slashable shares for each operatorSet | ||
address[] memory operatorArray = new address[](1); | ||
operatorArray[0] = defaultOperator; | ||
// (, uint256[][] memory slashableSharesOpset1_preSlash) = allocationManager |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Any reason why this is commented?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
unused var
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
wait no, same as other
// ); | ||
|
||
// assertEq(20e18, slashableSharesOpset1_postSlash[0][0], "slashableShares of opSet_1 should be 20e18"); | ||
// assertEq( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are we testing this in a separate func?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The fn was removed, need to find where this state lives now.
|
No description provided.