You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The Matrix is, as far as i understand, a leaf, not a node.
So the matrix itself cannot handle children of any type.
That is why i always look at a ROID as a path of (template-)nodes, except the last number which is a an Emberlement of any kind.
So i can follow any ROID in my tree by assuming all but the last number are nodes.
The documentation (Ember+ 1.1: Matrix Extensions) reads:
ParametersLocation
basePath RELATIVE-OID
Contains an absolute path to a node under which parameters associated with signals or connections reside.
inline Integer32 Contains a single sub-identifier to be appended to the path of the matrix. The resulting path refers to the node under which parameters associated with signals or connections reside. This node is not reported in a response to a GetDirectory command, since huge matrices with hundreds or thousands of connections will not be able to publish all connection and signal parameters in the Glow tree. The provider must create the parameter objects on-the-fly when a GetDirectory command is issued to a sub-node containing the parameters for a specific signal or connection.
So the inline Integer then results in a Node under the Matrix even though the Matrix is a leaf....
It is even more interesting with: Label
basePath [0] RELATIVE-OID
This property contains an absolute path to a node under which label parameters associated with signals reside.
description [1] EmberString
This property contains a free-text description of the label, which may be used by consumers to let the user choose the label to display.
I encountered ROIDs to a node as a child of a matrix. The EmberPlusViewer shows it under the matrix as a normal node.
This is confusing.
It the matrix a leaf or is it a node? or is it a leaf that may contain more leaves.
Matrix
number [0] Integer32
The number of the matrix object. Has same semantics as Parameter.number and Node.number.
contents [1] MatrixContents OPTIONAL
Contents set of the matrix object. Analogical to Parameter.contents and Node.contents.
children [2] ElementCollection OPTIONAL
Contains child elements of the matrix object. Conceptually, matrix objects are considered leafs in the Glow tree. Though, a matrix may contain a Glow Command in the same way as a parameter.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The Matrix is, as far as i understand, a leaf, not a node.
So the matrix itself cannot handle children of any type.
That is why i always look at a ROID as a path of (template-)nodes, except the last number which is a an Emberlement of any kind.
So i can follow any ROID in my tree by assuming all but the last number are nodes.
The documentation (Ember+ 1.1: Matrix Extensions) reads:
ParametersLocation
Contains an absolute path to a node under which parameters associated with signals or connections reside.
Contains a single sub-identifier to be appended to the path of the matrix. The resulting path refers to the node under which parameters associated with signals or connections reside. This node is not reported in a response to a GetDirectory command, since huge matrices with hundreds or thousands of connections will not be able to publish all connection and signal parameters in the Glow tree. The provider must create the parameter objects on-the-fly when a GetDirectory command is issued to a sub-node containing the parameters for a specific signal or connection.
So the inline Integer then results in a Node under the Matrix even though the Matrix is a leaf....
It is even more interesting with:
Label
This property contains an absolute path to a node under which label parameters associated with signals reside.
This property contains a free-text description of the label, which may be used by consumers to let the user choose the label to display.
I encountered ROIDs to a node as a child of a matrix. The EmberPlusViewer shows it under the matrix as a normal node.
This is confusing.
It the matrix a leaf or is it a node? or is it a leaf that may contain more leaves.
Matrix
The number of the matrix object. Has same semantics as Parameter.number and Node.number.
Contents set of the matrix object. Analogical to Parameter.contents and Node.contents.
Contains child elements of the matrix object. Conceptually, matrix objects are considered leafs in the Glow tree. Though, a matrix may contain a Glow Command in the same way as a parameter.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: