Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Groundtruth point-to-point map #4

Closed
zss1995 opened this issue May 10, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

Groundtruth point-to-point map #4

zss1995 opened this issue May 10, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@zss1995
Copy link

zss1995 commented May 10, 2020

Hello, I'm sorry to bother you again. I'm trying to evaluate the matching results, and there's some question about the groundtruth point-to-point map, for the number of points between shapes is different in each dataset(some shapes have slightly more points, some have fewer), and I don't know how to generate the groundtruth data.

@nicolasdonati
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi ! Your concern is perfectly legit, since I hadn't made ground-truths available. Now they should be, on the same link as the one you used for the datasets. There are two types of ground-truths here (yes, it's never easy ...).
-- For FAUST_r and SCAPE_r, they are under .vts files. Each .vts stores one array with exactly 5k entries, which is a map from a template (with 5k points) to the re-meshed shape (which has around 5k points, but it can vary). Be aware that this map is not bijective in general. Then to evaluate on these datasets, you use these .vts maps to mimic a ground-truth. It should be in the eval codes provided here. Also, you may notice that some .sym.vts are also provided. You should not need them, they store the map from the template to the intrinsic left-right symmetry of the re-meshed shape.
-- For SHREC_r, normal ground-truths are provided. Here too, the eval codes provided should show you how to use them.

@zss1995
Copy link
Author

zss1995 commented May 11, 2020

Thank you for your reply!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants