Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Additional features? #4

Open
KolbySisk opened this issue Jun 12, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Additional features? #4

KolbySisk opened this issue Jun 12, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@KolbySisk
Copy link
Owner

One of my goals when building this was to keep the project minimal. But I've had a few requests to add additional features. I'm curious if there is any consensus on adding additional features, and if so - which features would you like to see?

If you're reading this and you have an opinion on keeping this minimal vs adding features I'd love to hear your thoughts and which features you'd like to see included.

Potential features:

  • Testing (integration testing with Playwright and MSW)
  • i18n (i18next?)
  • Experimentation system (LaunchDarkly?)
  • Error Monitoring (Sentry?)
  • Observability (Better Stack?)
  • Type-safe environment (T3 Env)
@uptoamir
Copy link

Hi @KolbySisk
It is nice to have LaunchDarkly feature also.

@cgar420
Copy link

cgar420 commented Aug 5, 2024

I would like to see a full integration with the stripe webhooks.

Almost all are supported, but only a few are actually handled by this and the official template from Vercel

@kluplau
Copy link

kluplau commented Aug 8, 2024

Yeah it's a hard thing to balance features and minimalism just right.

i18n and Observability would be huge tho, and I honestly don't think it will add too much noise.
LaunchDarkly would be nice, but I fear it will add too much noise. I haven't used any feature flag implementation, so don't depend solely on my take.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants