Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

It's nice but ... #3

Closed
grumpygeek opened this issue Nov 13, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

It's nice but ... #3

grumpygeek opened this issue Nov 13, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@grumpygeek
Copy link

putting an entire website into an extension is the wrong approach. Even when it is changed later to point to a non-AMO site, it will still require users to update the 39MB extension to see one new extension. I hate to see you put the time in on making an extension when it really should be a website. If we get more or less the same thing hosted on an alternate website with it's own repository, then I'm not only in favor of it, I'd be willing to help.

@JustOff
Copy link
Owner

JustOff commented Nov 14, 2017

Since Mozilla declared they are going to remove all but WebExtensions from AMO, my original goal was to make my own local copy of all extensions. For this I needed a tool to check the integrity and completeness of this archive, thus CAA add-on was born.

It's not a perfect solution, but to date, as far as I know, it's the only one that already exists. Pale Moon and Waterfox teams are going to provide such archive as a vanilla website-based service, probably we will also see other alternatives, but now at least there is confidence that AMO data will not be lost.

@grumpygeek
Copy link
Author

grumpygeek commented Dec 2, 2017

I know you said you're taking a break, but there is no reason why everyone should wait on or depend on Binary Outcast. He doesn't have any more say over any of this than any of us. I'd hate to see him take over (again). We need some leaders who won't rub everyone the wrong way. A XUL dev site similar to moz-dev supported by volunteers would be good. We also should not just archive the old ones but update and add new ones as well.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants