-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test 1x1 cases #89
Comments
I added the case n==1 to all tests, except for those for tridiag.jl . For this one it is a bit more touchy because the sub-diagonal must be an empty complex array and I am not sure yet that everything works for that case. |
I understand very well the philosophy. |
That's a bug, I've filed an issue JuliaLang/LinearAlgebra.jl#945. In the meantime you could always disable that particular check for |
I fixed |
Just your friendly periodic reminder to mention the issue ( |
I notice that several of your tests are currently only testing 2x2 and larger matrices. They should be fixed to ensure that 1x1 works too.
(The trivial 1x1 case does not need to be optimized, but it should still work. I'm not sure if you were confused by this in JuliaLang/julia#84 — I suggested removing the
n==1
special case from the code to simplify the code paths and to remove an apparently superfluous optimization … the generic implementation should ideally be written in such a way as to work forn==1
without modifiction.)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: