You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Would be good to have a constructor to convert this to an ordinary LinearAlgebra.Tridiagonal type so that you have access to more O(n) matrix operations.
For #70, you implemented ldiv! and rdiv! for numbers. The interesting case, however, is to implement fast linear solves. (For the Tridiagonal type, this is done with an optimized LU factorization.) Converting to Tridiagonal and using the generic tridiagonal solver will be reasonably efficient, however.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In general, please link the commit or the PR to the issue that it closes — that way someone following the issue does not need to dig through the source code to find out how and where it was resolved.
Would be good to have a constructor to convert this to an ordinary
LinearAlgebra.Tridiagonal
type so that you have access to more O(n) matrix operations.For #70, you implemented
ldiv!
andrdiv!
for numbers. The interesting case, however, is to implement fast linear solves. (For theTridiagonal
type, this is done with an optimized LU factorization.) Converting toTridiagonal
and using the generic tridiagonal solver will be reasonably efficient, however.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: