Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 12, 2020. It is now read-only.

Internationalize mailing list service provided by political-issue-free sponsors? #202

Closed
i2000s opened this issue Jan 29, 2015 · 6 comments

Comments

@i2000s
Copy link
Contributor

i2000s commented Jan 29, 2015

Dear Julia developers,

I have been collaborating with community members from China. I would like to raise your attention that a major complaint from them is that they cannot access to many of our community service providers, including Twitter, YouTube, Google Groups and so on. Those service providers are believed collaborating closely with NSA and some global data surveilance programs like PRISM and refused to obey local laws, and hence are screened out from countries like China. I think the aftermath of using the services provided by those companies is that user groups from those countries (they have a big number of scientific/engineering/technical programmers) cannot get enough interaction from Julia community and they would hesitate to be a part of the Julia community, and in the end JuliaLang is screening out those potential users and developers from growing in those places.

I think, first of all, it might be good to switch to some political-issue-free mailing list service providers for group discussions which currently are under the hood of Google. We may neither want to bond JuliaLang's future to Yahoo, Mirosoft, Facebook and other big-names companies that have been well known for their collaboration with those global data surveilance programs since Snowden's disclosures. Mailing list service from academic institutes may be a good direction for us to consider to resolve this problem. I have consulted the IT desk of my home institute, University of New Mexico, about their mailing list service. They can provide free public mailing list service for org like us, but they can only archive emails up to 6 month. I wonder maybe MIT or other institutes could offer similar yet better mailing list service for us. Certainly, we should open to better options, and judge this issue in a broader picture.

Hopefully this issue can help us develop a better strategy for internationalizing our programming language and packages. See also recent issue 187.

Thanks,
Qi

@staticfloat
Copy link
Member

[Edited OP to point to proper issue link]

@ViralBShah
Copy link
Member

I don't think it is realistic at this time to move the mailing lists altogether.

But, are there ways to mirror the mailing list content elsewhere, and also have replies posted to the mirrored lists to be forwarded to the google group? This ought to be possible, and it should allow others to participate where firewalls block certain sites.

@ViralBShah
Copy link
Member

It ought to be easy to read here: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.julia.devel

For posting, I do think we need to whitelist the email addresses, but that should not be difficult.

@i2000s
Copy link
Contributor Author

i2000s commented Jan 30, 2015

@ViralBShah Mirroring sounds a good idea! A friend from China has just checked the availability of Gmane, and all works well. I think it is good to have Gmane or similar service on the run as an alternative Newsgroup interface and an archive place. This is what the C++ Boost community have adopted as well, to my knowledge.

@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

This can be closed now that it has moved to Discourse.

@i2000s
Copy link
Contributor Author

i2000s commented Dec 13, 2016

Thank everyone who is making this change. I will close this issue now.

@i2000s i2000s closed this as completed Dec 13, 2016
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants