You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We should probably link to MapMaths.jl in the Geodesy.jl readme as well.
@ettersi you mention Geodesy has a much larger number of contributors. That may be true over time, but currently it is not really being actively developed. I agree it would be great to move towards one standard package that is properly maintained. In my opinion breaking changes to Geodesy.jl are also an option to reach that goal.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I just became aware of https://github.com/subnero1/MapMaths.jl, which is a possible alternative to this package.
It was announced in this Discourse thread by @ettersi.
Here is a discussion on some differences:
https://github.com/subnero1/MapMaths.jl?tab=readme-ov-file#mapmaths-vs-geodesy
We should probably link to MapMaths.jl in the Geodesy.jl readme as well.
@ettersi you mention Geodesy has a much larger number of contributors. That may be true over time, but currently it is not really being actively developed. I agree it would be great to move towards one standard package that is properly maintained. In my opinion breaking changes to Geodesy.jl are also an option to reach that goal.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: