-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 53
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Supporting a static Taylor1 or TaylorN type? #240
Comments
That would be truly fantastic! I have been thinking about this lately, since I learned recently about Setfield.jl, which may be handy. Would you like to open a PR so we can check what would be running and what not? I guess the speed up would also go to TaylorIntegration.jl and TaylorModels.jl, so I am really interested on this. |
I have some (unreleased) work along these lines that basically does exactly what you're doing: We should definitely put together something there. |
Excellent! I'm definitely interested in pursuing this. Would you all prefer the work to be done on a fork of TaylorSeries.jl or shall I start playing with the StaticTaylorSeries.jl repository? |
For me it's ok if you would like to have it here. |
I was just wondering if anyone has thoughts around possibly supporting statically typed versions of Taylor series in this package. I've thrown together a sample implementation and it seems like there is a reasonable speed up to be had.
Sample Snippet:
Benchmarking script:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: