You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is a great benchmark, and is very useful in showing the relative performance of persistent data structures when isolated from external factors. However, I noticed that the benchmarks are missing a PCollections equivalent for the linked set/map and the ordered set/map. I believe this is because the benchmark was made before these data structures were added to PCollections, so I wonder if it would be worth adding some benchmarks for these new data structures and getting some new results.
Specifically, the new structures are:
Linked Set: OrderedPSet - doesn't seem to have a linked implementation, but the documentation specifies that the implementations are equivalent, and it's the entry order we're after here
Linked Map: OrderedPMap - doesn't seem to have a linked implementation, but the documentation specifies that the implementations are equivalent, and it's the entry order we're after here
This is a great benchmark, and is very useful in showing the relative performance of persistent data structures when isolated from external factors. However, I noticed that the benchmarks are missing a PCollections equivalent for the linked set/map and the ordered set/map. I believe this is because the benchmark was made before these data structures were added to PCollections, so I wonder if it would be worth adding some benchmarks for these new data structures and getting some new results.
Specifically, the new structures are:
OrderedPSet
- doesn't seem to have a linked implementation, but the documentation specifies that the implementations are equivalent, and it's the entry order we're after hereOrderedPMap
- doesn't seem to have a linked implementation, but the documentation specifies that the implementations are equivalent, and it's the entry order we're after hereTreePSet
TreePMap
I'd be up to re-run the new benchmarks and provide you with some new results.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: