Regressions and enhancements surrounding the new automatic field editor dialogue #8971
Closed
8 tasks done
Labels
automatic-field-editor
bug
Confirmed bugs or reports that are very likely to be bugs
type: enhancement
JabRef version
Latest development branch build (please note build date below)
Operating system
GNU / Linux
Details on version and operating system
JabRef 100.0.0 Linux 5.4.0-122-generic amd64 Java 18.0.1 JavaFX 18.0.1+2
Checked with the latest development build
Steps to reproduce the behaviour
Follow up issue to 9701e35
Some of my remarks may be nitpicks (less important), others are regressions from old "Manage field names and content".
The Automatic field editor can be opened by selecting an entry in the library and then go to
Edit > Automatic Field Editor
Issues:
1. Regression: The Field selection does not allow to write custom fields anymore. In the old version this was possible.
Before:
After:
2. I am not sure what
Clear field
is supposed to do.Example:
Press clear field.
Result: Nothing happens.
Non-critical/low priority issues that are based on personal subjective opinion
3. Rename
Clear field
toDelete field & content
orClear field content
, depending on how it behaves. See above. I don't really understand yet. Needs more testing/explanation.4. The tab name
two fields
is very ambiguous. It could be replaced withCopy, move & swap
orCopy, move & swap content
5. Replace all words in the
automatic field editor
dialogue that containvalue
withcontent
instead.Why? I argue the word content can be understood more easily than value. The word "value" can be attached to many things e.g. also to field names. The word "content" on the other hand means a value is within something and therefore in this specific context would be more specific.
6. Rename:
Also change the colour slightly to grey. Right now it almost looks like a button that could be pressed instead of being a field that can be written into.
Appendix
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: