Issue with INSPIRE web search

[isserstedt]

In my opinion, the INSPIRE web search does not work as expected anymore:

The search for, e.g., "Tanabashi:2018oca" should yield exactly one result but instead I get 10. In addition, among the search results is not the one I was looking for.

Furthermore, the key "Barrie:2019pqc" gets truncated to "Barrie2019" even though I turned off "Overwrite existing keys" in the preferences. This happens with every entry fetched from INSPIRE.

Version information:
JabRef 5.2--2020-12-24--6a2a512
Linux 5.4.0-58-generic amd64
Java 15.0.1

EDIT: Problem is still present in the following version:
JabRef 5.3--2020-12-28--020cc97
Linux 5.4.0-58-generic amd64
Java 15.0.1

[Siedlerchr]

@DominikVoigt Do you have an idea? Is this related to the new search syntax?

[isserstedt]

@Siedlerchr The old search syntax still works. Actually, there is no old syntax as far as I know. I guess the issue is related to the new API since INSPIRE got an extensive overhaul in 2020.

Regarding the unwanted key formatting, I have no clue where this could come from. But I doubt that the INSPIRE API provides a truncated/wrong key.

[github-actions]

This issue has been inactive for half a year. Since JabRef is constantly evolving this issue may not be relevant any longer and it will be closed in two weeks if no further activity occurs.

As part of an effort to ensure that the JabRef team is focusing on important and valid issues, we would like to ask if you could update the issue if it still persists. This could be in the following form:

• If there has been a longer discussion, add a short summary of the most important points as a new comment (if not yet existing).
• Provide further steps or information on how to reproduce this issue.
• Upvote the initial post if you like to see it implemented soon. Votes are not the only metric that we use to determine the requests that are implemented, however, they do factor into our decision-making process.
• If all information is provided and still up-to-date, then just add a short comment that the issue is still relevant.

Thank you for your contribution!