Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

4.0 Groups: fast access to View options #3269

Closed
danil-tolkachev opened this issue Oct 6, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

4.0 Groups: fast access to View options #3269

danil-tolkachev opened this issue Oct 6, 2017 · 1 comment
Labels
good first issue An issue intended for project-newcomers. Varies in difficulty. groups type: enhancement ui

Comments

@danil-tolkachev
Copy link

JabRef version 4.0 on Windows 7

I often switch between Union and Intersection modes. Please return the ability to quickly switch these settings. For example, you can add them to the global menu of Groups.
@lenhard lenhard added the groups label Oct 6, 2017
@Siedlerchr Siedlerchr reopened this Dec 16, 2017
@stoever stoever mentioned this issue Feb 18, 2018
Closed
5 tasks
@koppor koppor added good first issue An issue intended for project-newcomers. Varies in difficulty. and removed PE1718 labels Mar 9, 2018
@Siedlerchr Siedlerchr mentioned this issue Mar 30, 2018
Closed
6 tasks
@Siedlerchr Siedlerchr mentioned this issue Apr 14, 2018
Merged
6 tasks
@tobiasdiez tobiasdiez mentioned this issue May 6, 2018
Merged
35 tasks
@tobiasdiez
Copy link
Member

This should be fixed in the latest development version. Could you please check the build from http://builds.jabref.org/master/. Thanks! Please remember to make a backup of your library before trying-out this version.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
good first issue An issue intended for project-newcomers. Varies in difficulty. groups type: enhancement ui
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
5 participants
@Siedlerchr @koppor @lenhard @tobiasdiez @danil-tolkachev