Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"Do not wrap when saving" does not behave #10154

Open
2 tasks done
ilippert opened this issue Aug 10, 2023 · 4 comments
Open
2 tasks done

"Do not wrap when saving" does not behave #10154

ilippert opened this issue Aug 10, 2023 · 4 comments
Labels
bug Confirmed bugs or reports that are very likely to be bugs preferences

Comments

@ilippert
Copy link
Contributor

ilippert commented Aug 10, 2023

JabRef version

Latest development branch build (please note build date below)

Operating system

Linux Fedora

Details on version and operating system

JabRef 5.10--2023-07-04--ffedea2 Linux 6.4.8-200.fc38.x86_64 amd64 Java 21-internal JavaFX 20+19

Checked with the latest development build

  • I made a backup of my libraries before testing the latest development version.
  • I have tested the latest development version and the problem persists

Steps to reproduce the behaviour

  1. In the preferences/Entry, add to file;doi;isbn;issn;url an ; and a field name "abc"
  2. then close preferences
  3. open preferences/entry.

result: the field "abc" has been deleted.

I expect the field to persist.

Appendix

No response

@Siedlerchr
Copy link
Member

Confirmed

@Siedlerchr Siedlerchr added bug Confirmed bugs or reports that are very likely to be bugs preferences labels Aug 10, 2023
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Normal priority in Prioritization Aug 10, 2023
@Siedlerchr
Copy link
Member

One can define mulitline fields in the custom entry types dialog and these are also written to the "Do not wrap" preferences field list. On saving the prefs the custom entry type definitions override the manually added ones

@koppor
Copy link
Member

koppor commented May 18, 2024

@Siedlerchr and the correct behavior should be that the manually added ones should be kept? Thus, the fields should be merged?

@koppor
Copy link
Member

koppor commented May 18, 2024

Related issue: #9840

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Confirmed bugs or reports that are very likely to be bugs preferences
Projects
Status: Normal priority
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants