You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Would it be within scope to include consistent constructors/accessors in all existing types?
It's rather inconsistent which types can be created with an array of values. For example, vectors can be created using an array argument while matrices generally expect each value to be provided explicitly or from another matrix. On the other hand, matrices have getter methods which can output into a given array while vectors cannot.
Our team uses JOML extensively and I would be happy to PR said changes if this is something that would be accepted.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Would it be within scope to include consistent constructors/accessors in all existing types?
It's rather inconsistent which types can be created with an array of values. For example, vectors can be created using an array argument while matrices generally expect each value to be provided explicitly or from another matrix. On the other hand, matrices have getter methods which can output into a given array while vectors cannot.
Our team uses JOML extensively and I would be happy to PR said changes if this is something that would be accepted.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: