Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve documentation (provisioners, testsuite) #139

Open
fabiobrz opened this issue Feb 2, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Improve documentation (provisioners, testsuite) #139

fabiobrz opened this issue Feb 2, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation nice-to-have

Comments

@fabiobrz
Copy link
Member

fabiobrz commented Feb 2, 2024

The provisioners documentation should quickly drive the user to selecting the right tool for their use, so e.g.: a simple table of available (grouped) provisioners per service/product, along with a one-liner usage hint, would help.

The testsuite documentation shuld explain the available profiles and deployments build options.

  • Environment: documentation
  • Steps to reproduce: N/A
@fabiobrz fabiobrz added this to the IM2 - WIP milestone Feb 2, 2024
@fabiobrz fabiobrz added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Feb 3, 2024
@rsearls rsearls self-assigned this Apr 1, 2024
@fabiobrz fabiobrz self-assigned this May 2, 2024
@dosubot dosubot bot added the stale Issue has not had recent activity or appears to be solved. Stale issues will be automatically closed label Sep 19, 2024
@dosubot dosubot bot closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Oct 19, 2024
@dosubot dosubot bot removed the stale Issue has not had recent activity or appears to be solved. Stale issues will be automatically closed label Oct 19, 2024
@fabiobrz fabiobrz reopened this Oct 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation nice-to-have
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants