You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When I specify the "ratio" argument in "ggbarstats()" or "ggpiestats()", the test results seem wrong. However, manual application of the "contingency_table()" function from the "statsExpressions" package to a grouped tibble seems to give the right output.
I inspected the definition of "ggbarstats()" and I fail to understand why the results differ; see the example below.
library(ggstatsplot); library(statsExpressions); library(tidyverse); library(reprex)
#> You can cite this package as:#> Patil, I. (2021). Visualizations with statistical details: The 'ggstatsplot' approach.#> Journal of Open Source Software, 6(61), 3167, doi:10.21105/joss.03167data<-data.frame(
x=factor(c('low', 'high', 'low', 'low')),
type=factor(c(0, 0, 1, 1))
)
data %>%
group_by(type) %>%
group_modify(~ contingency_table(.x, x,
ratio= c(.001, .999))) %>%
ungroup() %>% suppressWarnings#> # A tibble: 2 × 14#> type statistic df p.value method effec…¹ estim…² conf.…³ conf.…⁴ conf.…⁵#> <fct> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <chr> <chr> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>#> 1 0 499. 1 2.01e-110 Chi-s… Pearso… 0.998 0.95 0.998 1#> 2 1 0.00200 1 9.64e- 1 Chi-s… Pearso… 0.0316 0.95 0 1#> # … with 4 more variables: conf.method <chr>, conf.distribution <chr>,#> # n.obs <int>, expression <list>, and abbreviated variable names ¹effectsize,#> # ²estimate, ³conf.level, ⁴conf.low, ⁵conf.high
extract_stats(ggpiestats(data, x=x, y=type,
ratio= c(.001, .999)))$one_sample_data#> # A tibble: 2 × 10#> type counts perc N statistic df p.value method .label .p.la…¹#> <fct> <int> <dbl> <chr> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <chr> <chr> <chr> #> 1 1 2 50 (n = 2) 2 1 0.157 Chi-squared… list(… list(~…#> 2 0 2 50 (n = 2) 0 1 1 Chi-squared… list(… list(~…#> # … with abbreviated variable name ¹.p.label
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
bodhisat
changed the title
"ratio" argument in ggpiestats/ggbarstats seems x
"ratio" argument in ggpiestats/ggbarstats seems dysfunctional
Nov 28, 2022
I am adding my comment to this post cause I have found the same thing. The parameter ratio doesn't seem to work when I run ggbarstat or ggpiestat and specify also the y argument. Is it normal?
E.g.:
ggpiestats(
data = Titanic_full,
x = Survived,
y = Sex,
ratio = c(.73, .27)
)
ggpiestats(
data = Titanic_full,
x = Survived,
y = Sex,
ratio = c(.27, .73)
)
If I run the two lines of code, the results won't change.
Is there a way to fix this?
When I specify the "ratio" argument in "ggbarstats()" or "ggpiestats()", the test results seem wrong. However, manual application of the "contingency_table()" function from the "statsExpressions" package to a grouped tibble seems to give the right output.
I inspected the definition of "ggbarstats()" and I fail to understand why the results differ; see the example below.
Created on 2022-11-28 with reprex v2.0.2
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: