oSPARC-S4L M2 ready

[odeimaiz]

What do these changes do?

Milestone 2 ready:

• No data tab for s4l product
• App mode concept implemented:
  • No workbench, No logger, only full-screen
  • In dynamic services: Header and settings are hidden
  • If the pipeline is linear, App mode can be started and, by default, the entire pipeline will be part of the slideshow
• Slideshow mode is persistent and an icon is shown in the study/template card
• If a template is published in Guided mode/ App mode, the instance will be started in that mode
• Make guided mode less buggy

Guided mode vs App mode:

Persistent and icons:

App mode template:

Add nodes from breadcrumbs:

Related issue/s

related to ITISFoundation/osparc-issues#496
closes #2561
Disable share link for templates #2560

How to test

Checklist

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #2555 (7a19dd6) into master (fa61db5) will increase coverage by 0.0%.
The diff coverage is 0.0%.

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #2555   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage    76.8%   76.8%           
======================================
  Files         623     623           
  Lines       24048   24050    +2     
  Branches     2356    2357    +1     
======================================
+ Hits        18488   18494    +6     
+ Misses       4932    4929    -3     
+ Partials      628     627    -1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	65.4% <0.0%> (-0.1%)	⬇️
unittests	71.4% <0.0%> (+<0.1%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...mcore_service_webserver/projects/projects_utils.py	79.6% <0.0%> (-1.5%)	⬇️
...ce_webserver/resource_manager/garbage_collector.py	73.1% <0.0%> (-0.9%)	⬇️
.../director/src/simcore_service_director/producer.py	62.3% <0.0%> (+0.8%)	⬆️
...simcore_service_director_v2/modules/dask_client.py	92.5% <0.0%> (+1.6%)	⬆️
...webserver/computation_comp_tasks_listening_task.py	85.7% <0.0%> (+2.0%)	⬆️

[pcrespov]

👍

[KZzizzle]

looks all good to me - should it also have StS's review?
Just two comments:

• I'm not sure it makes sense to allow making a node invisible through the "quick edit" since none of the other operations are possible (e.g. making a node visible, rearranging nodes) so it might be confusing to only that one function available. However if the PO's wanted it like that, then ignore my comment =)
• When a new node is created via the guided mode "quick edit" and ports cannot be auto-connected perhaps there should be a warning?

[odeimaiz]

• I'm not sure it makes sense to allow making a node invisible through the "quick edit" since none of the other operations are possible (e.g. making a node visible, rearranging nodes) so it might be confusing to only that one function available. However if the PO's wanted it like that, then ignore my comment =)

When you start the App Mode all nodes are added to the breadcrumbs, the App/GM mode designer might want to keep a computational service hidden (it will be run when the user "steps over")

[ignapas]

review in progress...

[ignapas]

imo indicator icons in dashboard items should have some sort of explanatory tooltip