You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In brainstorming ways to help prevent publishing of nondata deposits, some validations that would assist the curation team in reviewing content to meet our already limited data deposit guidelines
1- when a dataset deposit only contains one file--prevent publishing, send it for review (established collections should not have this validation)
2-when a dataset deposit contains "only one" file, and that file is a "pdf" - prevent publishing, send it for review ((established collections should not have this validation)
3 - Are we able to discern automatically when an author deposits more than one dataset into root and send a prompt that ask them to "pause deposits" and create a collection?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In brainstorming ways to help prevent publishing of nondata deposits, some validations that would assist the curation team in reviewing content to meet our already limited data deposit guidelines
1- when a dataset deposit only contains one file--prevent publishing, send it for review (established collections should not have this validation)
2-when a dataset deposit contains "only one" file, and that file is a "pdf" - prevent publishing, send it for review ((established collections should not have this validation)
3 - Are we able to discern automatically when an author deposits more than one dataset into root and send a prompt that ask them to "pause deposits" and create a collection?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: