You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The 5 ssp_cat_1 and the 9 ssp_cat_2 colour schemes are not consistent with each other:
I understand and agree with the ssp_cat_1 scheme: it has been used by many of the IIASA/IAM publications since circa 2017 (e.g. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378016300681), and many in the literature will be familiar with them, in a way that the AR5 RCPs have become familiar to many.
The ssp_cat_2 colour scheme should follow these for visual continuity: with two different shades of green for SSP1-1.9 and SSP1-2.6, two orange/yellow for SSP4-3.4 and SSP4-6.0, and two maroon/purple/pink for SSP5-8.5 and SSP5-3.4OS. I have heard the argument that the ssp_cat_2 scenarios are coloured as they are to follow approximately low to high radiative forcing = cool to warm pattern, but I argue that SSP4 is a rather "cautionary" tale in socio-economic terms and should be coloured as such (more of WG3 remit than WG1, but we should be consistent), even though SSP4-3.4 has lower forcing and expected to be cooler than SSP2-4.5.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The 5 ssp_cat_1 and the 9 ssp_cat_2 colour schemes are not consistent with each other:
I understand and agree with the ssp_cat_1 scheme: it has been used by many of the IIASA/IAM publications since circa 2017 (e.g. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378016300681), and many in the literature will be familiar with them, in a way that the AR5 RCPs have become familiar to many.
The ssp_cat_2 colour scheme should follow these for visual continuity: with two different shades of green for SSP1-1.9 and SSP1-2.6, two orange/yellow for SSP4-3.4 and SSP4-6.0, and two maroon/purple/pink for SSP5-8.5 and SSP5-3.4OS. I have heard the argument that the ssp_cat_2 scenarios are coloured as they are to follow approximately low to high radiative forcing = cool to warm pattern, but I argue that SSP4 is a rather "cautionary" tale in socio-economic terms and should be coloured as such (more of WG3 remit than WG1, but we should be consistent), even though SSP4-3.4 has lower forcing and expected to be cooler than SSP2-4.5.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: