feat(Journal tool) marking transactions as comment #2060
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
It looks like Travis is stuck running this build against |
|
Superseded by #2065. |
jniles
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 10, 2017
This commit implements the DELETE /transactions/:uuid route for invoices to remove records from the database. Closes #2060.
jniles
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 11, 2017
This commit implements the DELETE /transactions/:uuid route for invoices to remove records from the database. Closes #2060.
jniles
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 13, 2017
This commit implements the DELETE /transactions/:uuid route for invoices to remove records from the database. Closes #2060.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR gives to the user the possibility of commenting transactions
it solves this problem #1951