Replies: 2 comments
-
I think having more on missing values in R-Instat would be great. Would you see it getting it's own "sub menu section" in the Prepare menu, or would you see it elsewhere in there, such as under Data Frame or Check Data? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@lilyclements thanks for the addition. I would like to start by being able to cope with multiple missing values in R-Instat, at least when they arrive from SPSS, etc. @volloholic thought this was trivial, so I could handle it, but it seems not to be sufficiently trivial for me. I am keen on this aspect, to be able to make the point in the comparison with an ordinary spreadsheet, that statistics packages cope better with missing values and you can get messed up if you just use an ordinary spreadsheet. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
We are addressing this topic (currently only very incompletely) in the climatic menu. Here I propose we add more facilities for missing values, including infilling, into our prepare menu.
I am assuming that @lilyclements will contribute to this discussion. It relates also to her recent PhD topic.
a) We already have a package, written by @dannyparsons on the topic, though we don't yet use it, within R-Instat.
b) Our options for coping with missing, extend those offered by the usual R, in an impressive way.
There is an excellent article here: by Nicholas Tierney in 2021. This shows that just part of the topic is the infilling. I wonder how we could follow the sections in this article, with R-Instat. Perhaps we should now be adding
naniar
to R-Instat? For doing the actual imputation it uses the recentsimputation
package.Should this be a separate section in the Prepare menu. I assume it is mainly to deal with missing values in numeric variables, (so it could go there) but perhaps not?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions