generated from uwhackweek/jupyterbook-template
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 43
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Co-authored-by: fonongo <[email protected]>
- Loading branch information
1 parent
a31930d
commit 9cac5f2
Showing
1 changed file
with
49 additions
and
0 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ | ||
# Surfit 🏄♂️ | ||
|
||
## Team Members | ||
|
||
The following people contributed to our project throughout the week: | ||
* Project lead: Ben Purinton | ||
* Project lead: David Clemens-Sewall | ||
* Project lead: Jessica Badgeley | ||
* Helper: Nathan Kurtz | ||
* Helper: YoungHyun Koo | ||
* Team member: 'Ana Fonongava'inga Stringer | ||
* Team member: Chancelor Roberts | ||
* Team member: Emma Robertson | ||
* Team member: Karina Zikan | ||
|
||
|
||
## Project Goals | ||
Our main goal for this project was to see if we could assess surface roughness along track-length scales comparing ATL03 and ATL06 ICESat-2 data, across two regions of interest. | ||
|
||
Our motivating question(s) were: | ||
* Are surface roughness signals hiding in ATL03 at shorter along-track length scales compared with ATL06? | ||
|
||
Some personal goals that were shared coming into this project were: | ||
* To familiarize ourselves with accessing ICESat-2 data via cloud (e.g., sliderule, earthaccess, etc.). | ||
* Learn more about the tools we've been introduced to in the tutorials. | ||
* Learn how to access and subset ICESat-2 data. | ||
* Become more comfortable learning and sharing work in a collaborative environment - team science! | ||
|
||
### Regions of Interest | ||
We compared tracks from Black Rock Desert, Nevada and Utqiagvik, Alaska, our two regions of interest for this project. | ||
|
||
## Project Outcomes | ||
|
||
* Ben created visualizations to assess ICESat-2 its limitations over short along-track length scale, supporting understanding of data noise and limitations. | ||
* Karina provided a SlideRule tutorial that was adapted for the use of this project. | ||
* Chance, Emma, and Jessica worked on accessing ATL06 photon data using SlideRule and created a [Jupyter Notebook] (link to notebook). | ||
* YoungHyun obtained a geodataframe of the ATL03 data for the region of interest & analyzed how surface roughness varies with different yapc values. | ||
* Nathan wrote code that takes photon clouds and attempts to retrieve the associated surface height distribution. This code assumes the surface height distribution follows a Gaussian or log-normal distribution, convolves this with the ICESat-2 transmit pulse, and attempts to find the distribution parameters (mean height and width or roughness). This version of the code runs over a granule near Utqiagvik. | ||
* David created [include his updates here]. | ||
* Jessica provided support in project vision and bringing pieces together, identified a test track for the Black Rock ROI, and provided Git support for several group members. | ||
* Team members worked on increasing their familiarity with accessing ICESat-2 data from the cloud. | ||
|
||
|
||
## Future Efforts | ||
* Our team is considering expanding the regions of interest to include more diverse terrains to further validate our findings. | ||
* This work can potentially support future work in proposals for David's NCAR work in the near future. | ||
|
||
|
||
|