You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Great plugin guys! I use it everyday for work. TL;DR:
VSCode Version: 1.8.1
OS Version: Ubuntu 16.04
REST Client Version: 0.11.4
Steps to Reproduce:
Run a request that returns a response that is longer than 99 lines
More details
When REST-client receives a response with more than 99 lines, some of the numbers are rendered one on top of the other (see screenshot)
I also noticed that rendering a long request (~2500 lines in my case) takes quite a bit if time (~1min) and when scrolling up/down to view, it is sluggish and laggy. This is similar to described in #56 in the sense that it is not a network issue (response time is ~0.5sec); however, response size is quite small compared with 10MB discussed there:
Let me know if you require more details.
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@sfertman thanks for your usage. For the overlap issue, I have fixed in my master branch code, and will publish in next release ASAP. And for the performance issue, I have created a new issue #59 to track, and I will investigate how to improve the render performance, and will update status in that thread, and will notify you too. So I'd like to close this issue now.
Great plugin guys! I use it everyday for work.
TL;DR:
Steps to Reproduce:
More details
When REST-client receives a response with more than 99 lines, some of the numbers are rendered one on top of the other (see screenshot)
I also noticed that rendering a long request (~2500 lines in my case) takes quite a bit if time (~1min) and when scrolling up/down to view, it is sluggish and laggy. This is similar to described in #56 in the sense that it is not a network issue (response time is ~0.5sec); however, response size is quite small compared with 10MB discussed there:
Let me know if you require more details.
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: