Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 23, 2023. It is now read-only.

Build page for Why HospitalRun #15

Closed
jglovier opened this issue Sep 7, 2015 · 5 comments · Fixed by #86
Closed

Build page for Why HospitalRun #15

jglovier opened this issue Sep 7, 2015 · 5 comments · Fixed by #86
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@jglovier
Copy link
Member

jglovier commented Sep 7, 2015

Right now, the Why HospitalRun link just points to a Google Doc. Let's make a page for a better user experience than just reading all the content in a Google Doc.

The biggest question is how to structure the content, if differently from the Google Doc? For starters, we could certainly just use the outline in the doc, but having an actual landing page does give us a way to express the content in a more creative format. Thoughts on what you might do differently given that format?

In the meantime I'll work on comping up a basic version from the existing page content/layout.

@franciak
Copy link

@jglovier I would love to take a stab at this. I think it can look more market-able and succinct. 😄 Although, see #48. Maybe as I try to make one I can take some stuff in the file to be reused for a UI kit of some sort, in line with what I brought up in that issue. 😉

@jglovier
Copy link
Member Author

@franciak 👏 🎉 ❤️

@jglovier
Copy link
Member Author

jglovier commented May 8, 2017

@franciak just checking back in - is this still something you are working on? Any updates?

@anishaswain
Copy link
Contributor

@jglovier @tangollama @jkleinsc I would like to take this issue if nobody is still working on it :-)

@jglovier
Copy link
Member Author

@anisha1234 yes please! Go for it. 🎉

@franciak FYI since you have been unresponsive here since May 8th, I'm going to assume you were unable to work on this and let @anisha1234 pick up the effort from here.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants