Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor: wallet screen to functional component #488

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Feb 1, 2024

Conversation

tuliomir
Copy link
Collaborator

Acceptance Criteria

  • The wallet screen should be refactored to a functional component

Security Checklist

  • Make sure you do not include new dependencies in the project unless strictly necessary and do not include dev-dependencies as production ones. More dependencies increase the possibility of one of them being hijacked and affecting us.

@tuliomir tuliomir self-assigned this Jan 13, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 13, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: 969 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (c0553fa) 9.35% compared to head (628700f) 9.21%.
Report is 7 commits behind head on dev.

❗ Current head 628700f differs from pull request most recent head 8098579. Consider uploading reports for the commit 8098579 to get more accurate results

Files Patch % Lines
src/screens/SendTokens.js 0.00% 115 Missing and 9 partials ⚠️
src/screens/Wallet.js 0.00% 100 Missing and 14 partials ⚠️
src/screens/Server.js 0.00% 85 Missing and 21 partials ⚠️
src/screens/CreateNFT.js 0.00% 66 Missing and 5 partials ⚠️
src/screens/UnknownTokens.js 0.00% 65 Missing and 6 partials ⚠️
src/screens/Settings.js 0.00% 57 Missing and 4 partials ⚠️
src/screens/AddressList.js 0.00% 54 Missing and 5 partials ⚠️
src/screens/CreateToken.js 0.00% 52 Missing and 4 partials ⚠️
src/screens/StartHardwareWallet.js 0.00% 46 Missing and 7 partials ⚠️
src/screens/NewWallet.js 0.00% 49 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
... and 9 more
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##             dev    #488      +/-   ##
========================================
- Coverage   9.35%   9.21%   -0.15%     
========================================
  Files        112     112              
  Lines       5161    5242      +81     
  Branches     698     696       -2     
========================================
  Hits         483     483              
- Misses      4015    4098      +83     
+ Partials     663     661       -2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@tuliomir tuliomir force-pushed the refactor/functional-wallet branch from 878f69e to bb5e3ad Compare January 24, 2024 22:06
@tuliomir tuliomir marked this pull request as ready for review January 25, 2024 16:29
@tuliomir tuliomir removed the request for review from pedroferreira1 January 25, 2024 16:29
Comment on lines 45 to 56
const [backupDone, setBackupDone] = useState(LOCAL_STORE.isBackupDone());
/** successMessage {string} Message to be shown on alert success */
const [successMessage, setSuccessMessage] = useState('');
/* shouldShowAdministrativeTab {boolean} If we should display the Administrative Tools tab */
const [shouldShowAdministrativeTab, setShouldShowAdministrativeTab] = useState(false);
const [errorMessage, setErrorMessage] = useState(''); // TODO: Metadata token error are being suppressed as of now
const [totalSupply, setTotalSupply] = useState(null);
const [canMint, setCanMint] = useState(false);
const [canMelt, setCanMelt] = useState(false);
const [transactionsCount, setTransactionsCount] = useState(null);
const [mintCount, setMintCount] = useState(null);
const [meltCount, setMeltCount] = useState(null);
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[suggestion] Why not aggregate all the states in an object and use a single useState?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I initially implemented it like that because it's the most common pattern for functional components: a getter/setter for each property.

Upon further investigation, I've seen that by having a state for each property we allow React to optimize when to re-render each element in the screen. If we had a single state object, whenever we updated any of its properties the whole screen would be re-rendered.

In practice, this seems to have almost no performance impact, so it's left as a style decision. I even thought about having walletInfo: { mintCount, meltCount } and tokenInfo: { canMint, canMelt, txCount } , but it didn't feel like it would improve the legibility of the code.

What do you think?

Copy link
Collaborator

@alexruzenhack alexruzenhack Jan 30, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't have much to say. If it is better to use this way lets keep it.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's usually preferable to use each property as a different state so we can pass them as dependencies on useCallback and useEffect and other hooks, allowing react to memoize those hooks

import hathorLib from '@hathor/wallet-lib';
import { t } from 'ttag';
import { get } from 'lodash';
import { connect } from "react-redux";
import { useDispatch, useSelector } from "react-redux";
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
import { useDispatch, useSelector } from "react-redux";
import { useDispatch, useSelector } from 'react-redux';

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed on f85bf7c

useWalletService: state.useWalletService,
};
};
import { useHistory } from "react-router-dom";
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is the linter passing?

Suggested change
import { useHistory } from "react-router-dom";
import { useHistory } from 'react-router-dom';

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We don't have a linter on this repo yet. 😞
Opened issue #500 for this.

Fixed on f85bf7c.

const [successMessage, setSuccessMessage] = useState('');
/* shouldShowAdministrativeTab {boolean} If we should display the Administrative Tools tab */
const [shouldShowAdministrativeTab, setShouldShowAdministrativeTab] = useState(false);
const [errorMessage, setErrorMessage] = useState(''); // TODO: Metadata token error are being suppressed as of now
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So why should we leave this here?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Even though issue #487 is already open to fix this I found it best to leave it as a warning in the code itself, because this is a bug.

Do you agree with leaving it as a comment?

Copy link
Contributor

@andreabadesso andreabadesso Feb 1, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I mean, setErrorMessage is not being used anywhere in this file, and it's a generic error message

So why keep it there?

Maybe remove the const [errorMessage, setErrorMessage] = useState(''); part and update the comment to explain that metadata fetch errors are being ignored

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done on 8098579

@tuliomir tuliomir force-pushed the refactor/functional-wallet branch from 628700f to 8098579 Compare February 1, 2024 15:42
@tuliomir tuliomir merged commit 0c6771b into dev Feb 1, 2024
4 checks passed
@tuliomir tuliomir deleted the refactor/functional-wallet branch February 1, 2024 16:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants