Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

On semeval performance #14

Open
libing125 opened this issue Aug 27, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

On semeval performance #14

libing125 opened this issue Aug 27, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@libing125
Copy link

I run your code with

CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES=0,1,2,3 python3 run_classifier_TABSA.py --task_name semeval_QA_B --data_dir data/semeval2014/bert-pair --vocab_file uncased_L-12_H-768_A-12/vocab.txt --bert_config_file uncased_L-12_H-768_A-12/bert_config.json --init_checkpoint uncased_L-12_H-768_A-12/pytorch_model.bin --eval_test --do_lower_case --max_seq_length 512 --train_batch_size 24 --learning_rate 2e-5 --num_train_epochs 12.0 --output_dir results_v2/semeval_result/QA_B --seed 42

and get best performance at epoch 10

aspect_P = 0.9109792284866469
aspect_R = 0.8985365853658537
aspect_F = 0.9047151277013752
sentiment_Acc_4_classes = 0.8439024390243902
sentiment_Acc_3_classes = 0.8735868448098664
sentiment_Acc_2_classes = 0.9306029579067122

But it should be

BERT-pair-QA-B 85.9 89.9 95.6

as in your article.

What should I do to reproduce your results? Thanks.

@HSLCY
Copy link
Owner

HSLCY commented Sep 2, 2019

The recommended epoch for fine-tuning BERT model is 3 or 4.
Besides, you can try to change the random seed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants