-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
Presumable Installation Problem: Wall of Errors #15
Comments
Hi Dan, I'm sorry to know that the installation cost a lot of time. The log you provided indicates that the tool tries to call variants out of the defined region "[E::mpileup] fail to parse region 'chr1:-33-4979162' with". the "-33" position is illegal for Clair3-Trio and Samtools's mpileup. Clair3-Trio has a position boundary check, however, we might leave cases that cause bugs in our pipeline. Could you please share your complete log and bam with us (to email address [email protected]) for further debugging on our side? Bam files for alignment in chr1 should be enough for debugging purposes. On the other hand, one way to avoid the error is to provide bed files to tools like "--bed_fn=${_INPUT_DIR}/quick_demo.bed". Regards, |
Hi Junhao, Unfortunately I don't think I can share any data as this is patient data. I did neglect to mention that the data comes from adaptive sampling (about 5% of the genome) and so was optimistic supplying a BED to bed_fun would solve the issue. Unfortunately, it did not resolve the issue. The error is the same: TypeError: metaclass conflict: the metaclass of a derived class must be a (non-strict) subclass of the metaclasses of all its bases I think I'll have to pivot to a different tool in the meantime but I'd like to ultimately get this one working as it is my preference. I'll retry the Singularity approach again today too. Many thanks, |
Hi Daniel, The error line "TypeError: metaclass conflict: the metaclass of a derived class must be a (non-strict) subclass of the metaclasses of all its bases" seems from the TensorFlow install problem. I rechecked the bioconda installation script and found a version typo in the installation script. Sorry in case this is the reason for the inconvenience. I fixed it in README, you may try to reinstall the package via bioconda. On the other hand, we recommend using our package via singularity, it should be the most convenient one. If you want to dig into the package, we recommend installing via Anaconda. Regards, |
Hi,
I have been trying for the last five hours to get this tool installed properly. After finally being able to run it without an immediate error, I thought the code was finally working. But I was wrong. It run for about half an hour before finishing but when I checked the output it was a very long list of errors (with lots of repetition). Here's the top:
Package (for this attempt) was installed using the bioconda method. Besides the models not being preinstalled in /bin/ and having to supply them myself, I thought it looked OK. Script looks like this:
Anything obvious? I'd really like to get this to work rather than switching to a different tool.
Many thanks!
Dan
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: