My overall thought on this CoC is that it lays out many points we aren't willing to nor capable of reinforcement. We don't want to do moderation whenever possible.

In other words we don't want to monitor for "unacceptable behavior" in any form other than behavior mentioned in the linked issue. For example if someone use strong wording cause some feelings hurt but at the same time offers valid and on topic contribution we don't want to do anything about it.

A simplification of the "Our Standard" session would be great. Here are my preference of it:

Examples of unacceptable behavior include:

* Off topic posting
* Spamming
* Illegal activities targeting community member
* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a
  professional setting

My overall thought on this CoC is that it lays out many points we aren't willing to nor capable of reinforcement. We don't want to do moderation whenever possible.

In other words we don't want to monitor for "unacceptable behavior" in any form other than behavior mentioned in the linked issue. For example if someone use strong wording cause some feelings hurt but at the same time offers valid and on topic contribution we don't want to do anything about it.

A simplification of the "Our Standard" session would be great. Here are my preference of it:

Examples of unacceptable behavior include:

* Off topic posting
* Spamming
* Illegal activities targeting community member
* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a
  professional setting

I think the one I provided should work because I feel you don't need to moderate on this issues all the time like it is quite rare I mean really really rare. So chances of these incidents are quite small that's why I proposed the GitHub's standard contributor covert guidelines because it is quite the simplest and it is quite the standard among all open source projects. I hope you got the idea 🙂 .

It's not about rarity. It's all about commitment. If a CoC is added we will do our best to reinforcement so the detail is very important to fit our capability.

I has to do with the fact that in real world online interactions can be complicated with overloading of information. There is not always a clear line between positive interaction and "unacceptable behavior". And moderating them can be dramatic and controversial.