Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Data export based on extent #889

Closed
capooti opened this issue May 31, 2013 · 6 comments
Closed

Data export based on extent #889

capooti opened this issue May 31, 2013 · 6 comments
Assignees
Labels
feature A new feature to be added to the codebase
Milestone

Comments

@capooti
Copy link
Member

capooti commented May 31, 2013

The download link in the layer info page should export data clipped to the currently selected extent in the map frame.
This shouldn't be that complicated, as the GS WFS GetFeature and WCS GetCoverage supports the BBOX parameter.

@ghost ghost assigned capooti May 31, 2013
@jj0hns0n
Copy link
Contributor

Perhaps a dupe of #389

@jj0hns0n
Copy link
Contributor

Moving to 2.5. Clip and Ship would still be very useful.

@capooti
Copy link
Member Author

capooti commented Jan 29, 2015

I think I will need to work with this in the next days as we really need it urgently. Maybe in the sprint if I have time? So assigning it to me and set back to 2.4 milestone.

@capooti capooti modified the milestones: 2.4, 2.5.x Jan 29, 2015
@jlautarosilva
Copy link

this feature is going to be implemented in 2.4? I offer myself for testing.

@simod
Copy link
Member

simod commented Oct 28, 2015

I don't think it will be.

@jj0hns0n jj0hns0n modified the milestones: 2.4, 2.5.x Nov 18, 2015
@jj0hns0n
Copy link
Contributor

There was a thread about this feature from WFP. @pjdufour do you have any insight on the status. Would be good to get merged for 2.5/2.6 but moving to 2.7 for now until we know.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature A new feature to be added to the codebase
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants