Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Homogenize maps in the website #88

Closed
Esteban82 opened this issue Oct 12, 2023 · 4 comments
Closed

Homogenize maps in the website #88

Esteban82 opened this issue Oct 12, 2023 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@Esteban82
Copy link
Member

There are some small differences in the static figures (https://www.generic-mapping-tools.org/remote-datasets/index.html).

The idea is to make all similar (and add scripts to those that don't have).

Important doubts:

  1. Should I extend the maps at to the poles (for those that don't have data their)? I think we should so the users can clearly see the lack of the data there (and also all the figures have the same size).

Minor doubts:

  1. With or without a frame? Some of them have.
  2. There are maps with jpg and png format. I should respect that, right?
@Esteban82 Esteban82 self-assigned this Oct 12, 2023
@PaulWessel
Copy link
Member

  1. It may be cleaner to have the full -Rd view even if it stops at 82N and gets blocked by Antarctica in the south.
    1. I think no frame is good. These images are just showing what it is, crudely.
  2. Just happen because these were mostly one-off. If jpg is smaller then perhaps that makes more sense?

@Esteban82
Copy link
Member Author

  1. Yes, I tought that the jpg was to get an smaller size.

Also, I forgot to mention that I will make the maps with the 10m resolution.

@PaulWessel
Copy link
Member

All good.

This was referenced Oct 13, 2023
@Esteban82
Copy link
Member Author

Done by #91.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants