GCop 201

[marjanjavid]

The third sample written in this document does not fire this warning. If it is not a valid sample let me know to remove the example.
https://github.com/Geeksltd/GCop/blob/master/Rules/GCop201.md

[Karvan]

It's a valid sample for me while it's a capital letter after the underline character.

[Foroughi]

@marjanjavid @Karvan I can't see anything regards to the third sample in the rule logic. As I'm checking, the rule will kick in only for local declaration variables and parameters. btw I don't agree with Karvan and i think the third one is not a valid sample as its being started with an underscore char. So building on what i said, @Karvan do I need to change this rule ?!