Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify documentation on calling versus tumor fraction estimation #10

Open
lbeltrame opened this issue Aug 4, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

Comments

@lbeltrame
Copy link

Hello,

it is quite unclear if the parameters being set have an impact on copy number calling. We've been doing some benchmarking altering for example --txnE and its pair option, and while we can loosely understand the relationship they have with the calculation of tumor fraction, it is quite unclear how and if they affect copy number calling.

Is there any reference we can look up to see how it is actually being calculated and how it can be adjusted, if such a thing is possible?

@ilykos
Copy link

ilykos commented Dec 10, 2023

@lbeltrame
Copy link
Author

I took a look, but my doubt remans: it's totally unclear how CN calls affect tumor fraction (if they do). In our experimentation, there seemed to be no relationship at all, on the surface.

@ilykos
Copy link

ilykos commented Dec 10, 2023

@lbeltrame Just curious, what values range did you probe?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants