Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MIR counterparts to llvm_extract and llvm_compositional_extract #2085

Open
2 tasks
RyanGlScott opened this issue Aug 7, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
2 tasks

MIR counterparts to llvm_extract and llvm_compositional_extract #2085

RyanGlScott opened this issue Aug 7, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
subsystem: crucible-mir Issues related to Rust verification with crucible-mir and/or mir-json type: feature request Issues requesting a new feature or capability
Milestone

Comments

@RyanGlScott
Copy link
Contributor

RyanGlScott commented Aug 7, 2024

Currently, the MIR backend lacks a way to extract a Rust function into a SAWScript Term. This would be useful in tandem with the prove and sat commands.

To do so, we should make MIR versions of the following, existing commands:

  • llvm_extract (which only allows scalar types)
  • llvm_compositional_extract (which also allows reference types).
@RyanGlScott RyanGlScott added type: enhancement Issues describing an improvement to an existing feature or capability type: feature request Issues requesting a new feature or capability subsystem: crucible-mir Issues related to Rust verification with crucible-mir and/or mir-json labels Aug 7, 2024
@sauclovian-g sauclovian-g removed the type: enhancement Issues describing an improvement to an existing feature or capability label Nov 8, 2024
@sauclovian-g sauclovian-g added this to the Someday milestone Nov 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
subsystem: crucible-mir Issues related to Rust verification with crucible-mir and/or mir-json type: feature request Issues requesting a new feature or capability
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants