Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Questbook url hotzones are wrong (again) #15709

Closed
2 of 3 tasks
chochem opened this issue Mar 12, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed
2 of 3 tasks

Questbook url hotzones are wrong (again) #15709

chochem opened this issue Mar 12, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@chochem
Copy link
Member

chochem commented Mar 12, 2024

Your GTNH Discord Username

chochem

Your Pack Version

nightly-374

Your Server

SP

Java Version

Java 20

Type of Server

Single Player

Your Expectation

the clickable hotzones should line up with the link text.

The Reality

as one can see with the debug that highlights the zones, they are off:
image

Your Proposal

fix it :)

Final Checklist

  • I have searched this issue tracker and there is nothing similar already. Posting on a closed issue saying the bug still exists will prompt us to investigate and reopen it once we confirm your report.
  • I can reproduce this problem consistently by follow the exact steps I described above, or this does not need reproducing, e.g. recipe loophole.
  • I have asked other people and they confirm they also have this problem by follow the exact steps I described above, or this does not need reproducing, e.g. recipe loophole.
@boubou19
Copy link
Member

@chochem
Copy link
Member Author

chochem commented Mar 12, 2024

oh, I am blind. I saw that PR but didnt see the fix down there sneaking in the comments. will try!

@chochem
Copy link
Member Author

chochem commented Mar 12, 2024

alright, nice. indeed all fixed with BQ 3.5.9-GTNH. Thanks!

@chochem chochem closed this as completed Mar 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants