You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 25, 2024. It is now read-only.
It should be clear who the primary creator, maintainer, and facilitator is for each of these initiatives:
Federal?
Non-federal?
Vendor?
NGO
Because this is a .gov and federal resource, federal initiatives like DATA Act, FDGC, WH PDI, NIST meetings and opportunities for public comment, etc should in my view be prioritized.
If it is not a federal initiative those partners' roles in the federation should be as explicit as possible and these initiatives should be flagged separately. There should be a disclaimer that you are leaving a federal website when you are directed to these initiative's websites.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
It should be clear who the primary creator, maintainer, and facilitator is for each of these initiatives:
Because this is a .gov and federal resource, federal initiatives like DATA Act, FDGC, WH PDI, NIST meetings and opportunities for public comment, etc should in my view be prioritized.
If it is not a federal initiative those partners' roles in the federation should be as explicit as possible and these initiatives should be flagged separately. There should be a disclaimer that you are leaving a federal website when you are directed to these initiative's websites.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: