Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Networked components need to identity roles other than provider #932

Closed
14 tasks
aj-stein-gsa opened this issue Nov 23, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed
14 tasks

Comments

@aj-stein-gsa
Copy link
Contributor

Constraint Task

There must be at least one responsible-role entry other than the required provider's role for a networked component.

Intended Outcome

Ensure that other roles other than the catch-all provider role are defined to understand explicit responsibilities for that component.

Syntax Type

This is required core OSCAL syntax.

Allowed Values

There are no relevant allowed values.

Metapath(s) to Content

<!-- Metapath context target -->
//component[ (@type='service'  and not(./prop[@name='leveraged-authorization-uuid']) and ./prop[@name='implementation-point' and @value='external']) or (@type='interconnection') or (@type='service' and ./prop[@name='implementation-point' and @value='internal'] and ./prop[@name='direction']) or (@type='software' and ./prop[@name='asset-type' and @value='cli'] and ./prop[@name='direction']) ]

<!-- Constraint requirement: There must be at least one responsible-role entry other than the required provider's role: -->
count(./responsible-role[not(@role-id='provider')]) >= 1

Purpose of the OSCAL Content

No response

Dependencies

No response

Acceptance Criteria

  • All OSCAL adoption content affected by the change in this issue have been updated in accordance with the Documentation Standards.
    • Explanation is present and accurate
    • sample content is present and accurate
    • Metapath is present, accurate, and does not throw a syntax exception using oscal-cli metaschema metapath eval -e "expression".
  • All constraints associated with the review task have been created
  • The appropriate example OSCAL file is updated with content that demonstrates the FedRAMP-compliant OSCAL presentation.
  • The constraint conforms to the FedRAMP Constraint Style Guide.
    • All automated and manual review items that identify non-conformance are addressed; or technical leads (David Waltermire; AJ Stein) have approved the PR and “override” the style guide requirement.
  • Known good test content is created for unit testing.
  • Known bad test content is created for unit testing.
  • Unit testing is configured to run both known good and known bad test content examples.
  • Passing and failing unit tests, and corresponding test vectors in the form of known valid and invalid OSCAL test files, are created or updated for each constraint.
  • A Pull Request (PR) is submitted that fully addresses the goals section of the User Story in the issue.
  • This issue is referenced in the PR.

Other information

Part of #808

@brian-ruf
Copy link
Collaborator

Issue #893 was expanded to include both leveraged authorizations and networked components. This issue is now both redundant and out of date. Closing as unnecessary.

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from 🏗 In progress to ✅ Done in FedRAMP Automation Nov 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: ✅ Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants