-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 90
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
SSP Completeness Checks: Appendices B Acronyms & L Laws and Regulations #815
Comments
AnalysisThe FedRAMP PMO no longer maintains/publishes the FedRAMP Master Acronym and Glossary. As such the requirement for a reference to this document is dropped. The importance of its presence is when OSCAL SSP content is passed to other interested parties, such as assessors or Agencies, the content includes up-to-date links to the list of FedRAMP Laws and Regulations. The resources MUST have:
|
Constraints Definition
|
@aj-stein-gsa / @Rene2mt - this is ready, but small. I'm going to change it to a task and put it up for work. |
@brian-ruf to revisit this to consider CSP-added acronyms. |
This is a ...
fix - something needs to be different
This relates to ...
User Story
As a consumer of FedRAMP automated completeness checks I want the following OSCAL-based SSP items to be automatically verified for completeness by metaschema constraints:
Goals
SSP Completeness checks are defined, tested and documented
Dependencies
No response
Acceptance Criteria
Other information
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: