Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Discussion: Consider swapping Zod with Typebox #261

Open
heggemsnes opened this issue Feb 3, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Discussion: Consider swapping Zod with Typebox #261

heggemsnes opened this issue Feb 3, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@heggemsnes
Copy link
Contributor

This is kind of a follow up to my #228 issue. We've been using groqd extensively and we really love it, but at some point in the development for larger projects the TS compiler slows to a halt with potential scary Type instantiation is excessively deep and possibly infinite..

Been tearing my hair out around this but after doing some more research around Zod and TS I believe this might not be the correct package for this kind of project. Check out this interesting article about TS validators performance..

I am not sure if groqd should change like this but I really just want to open the discussion on this issue as it is a "creeping issue" that only comes when you're already in too deep...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant