Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updated static api examples #209

Merged
merged 18 commits into from
Jun 29, 2016
Merged

Updated static api examples #209

merged 18 commits into from
Jun 29, 2016

Conversation

TonyWalsworthImg
Copy link
Contributor

Updated static api examples, added supporting images.

@seank-img seank-img added this to the 0.2.0 milestone Jun 28, 2016
@seank-img
Copy link
Contributor

@TonyWalsworthImg the image Awa_client_tutorial_application_positioning_static_api.png is incorrect as there is no client daemon with the Static API, it should look something like:

image

What we need to show is that the client tutorial application is the only process - with the Awa API we have two processes (the example aplication and the client daemon) that communicate over the IPC that represent the client. With the Awa static API we have a single process that handles the application logic and the LWM2M processing, and this represents the client.

@TonyWalsworthImg
Copy link
Contributor Author

I've adjusted the image in line with suggestions. I've also changed the remaining image to remove the client daemon.
awa_client_tutorial_application_positioning_static_api

and...

awa_client_tutorial_static_api

@DavidAntliff
Copy link
Collaborator

@TonyWalsworthImg looks good, however this needs to be merged with the base branch before we can merge it.

@TonyWalsworthImg
Copy link
Contributor Author

@david-antliff-imgtec I carried out a base branch merge - so should be good to go.

@seank-img seank-img merged commit 75a8cbe into ConnectivityFoundry:master Jun 29, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants