Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deprecate push!(dh, ...) in favor of add!(dh, ...) #578

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 10, 2023
Merged

Conversation

fredrikekre
Copy link
Member

This patch deprecates push!(dh::DofHandler, ...) in favor of add!(dh,...). This is to make it consistent with how constraints are added to the constraint handler, and using Base.push! for this was a bit of a pun anyway.

This patch deprecates `push!(dh::DofHandler, ...)` in favor of `add!(dh,...)`.
This is to make it consistent with how constraints are added to the
constraint handler, and using `Base.push!` for this was a bit of a pun anyway.
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jan 10, 2023

Codecov Report

Base: 92.76% // Head: 92.76% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (9bce6c0) compared to base (9c34e96).
Patch coverage: 50.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #578   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.76%   92.76%           
=======================================
  Files          28       28           
  Lines        4202     4202           
=======================================
  Hits         3898     3898           
  Misses        304      304           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/Dofs/MixedDofHandler.jl 86.09% <20.00%> (ø)
src/Dofs/DofHandler.jl 90.72% <100.00%> (ø)
src/L2_projection.jl 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants