Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Split PETSc and non-PETSc tests on CI #3184

Merged
merged 46 commits into from
Apr 29, 2024
Merged

Split PETSc and non-PETSc tests on CI #3184

merged 46 commits into from
Apr 29, 2024

Conversation

garth-wells
Copy link
Member

This speeds up CI, and will avoid regressions when PETSc is not installed.

@garth-wells garth-wells added the ci Continuous Integration label Apr 28, 2024
@garth-wells garth-wells marked this pull request as ready for review April 28, 2024 18:27
@garth-wells garth-wells requested a review from jhale April 29, 2024 09:58
@jorgensd
Copy link
Member

We need to add some separate tests of the petsc interaction/integration with DOLFINx. Currently LinearProblem is untested, which is not great.

@garth-wells garth-wells merged commit 7c1812e into main Apr 29, 2024
23 checks passed
@garth-wells garth-wells deleted the garth/petsc4py-test branch April 29, 2024 11:25
jorgensd added a commit to jorgensd/dolfinx_mpc that referenced this pull request May 6, 2024
Moving CI to ubuntu 22.04/python 3.12:

    --break-system-packages and --no-build-isolation needed for most python3 -m pip install commands
    Run docker build on pull request to main and release to catch build issues
    Bump jorgensd/actions/install-dolfinx to v0.3

Cmake/nanobind:

    PETSc/petsc4py now optional, extra cmake code required

Dolfinx/basix:

    dtype: Consistently added to basix.ufl.element to work on single precision builds
    nullspace computation for rigid motions updated, ref: 

Split PETSc and non-PETSc tests on CI FEniCS/dolfinx#3184
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ci Continuous Integration
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants