You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We have added a 'bubblephone' channel to some of our ocean bottom seismometers. This consists of electronics that bandpass the hydrophone data at a high frequency and then outputs the envelope at a low-enough frequency for the datalogger to correctly sample. This RSAM-like technique allows the instrument to record "bubbles" (several kHz) even though it only samples 125x/second.
Previously we would have given a source code of 'X' as it is derived data, even though not derived by a computer. I imagine we should instead give it a source code of 'D' (pressure) and request a new sub-source code ('B' for 'bubblephone', 'R' for RSAM?...). Do you agree and, if so, how should I request this from FDSN. The proposed documentation doesn't say this.
Regards
Wayne
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We have added a 'bubblephone' channel to some of our ocean bottom seismometers. This consists of electronics that bandpass the hydrophone data at a high frequency and then outputs the envelope at a low-enough frequency for the datalogger to correctly sample. This RSAM-like technique allows the instrument to record "bubbles" (several kHz) even though it only samples 125x/second.
Previously we would have given a source code of 'X' as it is derived data, even though not derived by a computer. I imagine we should instead give it a source code of 'D' (pressure) and request a new sub-source code ('B' for 'bubblephone', 'R' for RSAM?...). Do you agree and, if so, how should I request this from FDSN. The proposed documentation doesn't say this.
Regards
Wayne
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: