Suggestions regarding subsource creepmeter

[javiquinte]

On behalf of Frederik Tilmann

Subsource Creepmeter

That might be my lack of understanding as a non-specialist in creep
meters but If found the description confusing.

The orientation and therefore the dip and azimuth would be
perpendicular to the measuring beam

It seems the direction perpendicular to a line has some arbitrariness to it. Should this read
"parallel" instead (would make sense to me)

Dip/azimuths:

"Along the fault or wire"

I would not put the fault in this description as this depends on the setup, and the orientation of
natural feature should not matter. Why use wire here but beam in the in-text description?