Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question: Is this code base good for production usage? #1

Open
ghost opened this issue Jul 27, 2017 · 6 comments
Open

Question: Is this code base good for production usage? #1

ghost opened this issue Jul 27, 2017 · 6 comments

Comments

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jul 27, 2017

Thanks for sharing this project with the community. As I see, this projects hasn't been updated over last 4 years or so but was being used in ExtraHop products. Is this project going to be updated with latest changes if any? Is this still being used in production at ExtraHop?

@daethnir
Copy link

Indeed, this is still used in production quite widely. We do have a number of improvements that we haven't pushed up here recently - I'll get that on the docket here in the next few weeks.

We'll happily accept suggestions/pull requests. What's your use case?

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Jul 27, 2017

I am looking at grabbing packets and dumping them a time series db for offline analysis, an APM use case to figure out latency issues. From improvement point of view, the only feature I will probably add to rpcapd would be sampling at the source.

Would love to know what are the improvements done by your team, happy to help in dev/testing of any features if they are still in the works.

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Jul 29, 2017

Any inputs on the queries above would help me a lot! Please suggest.

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Aug 13, 2017

Hello again, any updates on features in pipeline to be released here? Thank you.

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Aug 24, 2017

We added end to end encryption to rpcapd after resolving some initial issues. Would love to know if we are re-inventing the wheel and you have already implemented these bits in your version which is being pushed up here.

@daluu
Copy link

daluu commented Mar 25, 2024

Unfortunate that we haven't heard a response from @daethnir or ExtraHop here.

And unfortunate the OP's account is deleted as well. I wanted to ask some follow up questions regarding "we added end to end encryption to rpcapd after resolving some initial issues". Because rpcapd is now part of libpcap, and they have added TLS/SSL encryption support for rpcap (both rpcapd and rpcap clients). It would have been nice to check if the mentioned changes are similar or different from libpcap's changes and whether further improvements could be merged in there if the changes were permitted to be shared as open source.

For this repo, I would say aside from active mode here, without encryption and security improvements, there will always be security concerns for running this on production.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants