-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[HOLD for payment 2024-01-24] Settings - 'Go to Expensify Classic' options redirect to prod, not STG version #33284
Comments
👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:
|
Triggered auto assignment to @srikarparsi ( |
ProposalPlease re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.'Go to Expensify Classic' options redirect to prod, not STG version What is the root cause of that problem?We have defined the production link for the action in the app: App/src/pages/settings/InitialSettingsPage.js Lines 268 to 272 in aa1d87c
What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?We should update the Line 473 in aa1d87c
EXPENSIFY_INBOX_URL: 'https://www.staging.expensify.com/inbox', Alternatively:We can add a another key We may then also change the current one to We'll be updating all mentions of the key in the app, |
ProposalPlease re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.What is the root cause of that problem?We are using the hard-coded prod URL in the menu item: App/src/pages/settings/InitialSettingsPage.js Lines 267 to 272 in aa1d87c
What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?We shouldn't use the constant URL, but instead use the {
translationKey: 'initialSettingsPage.goToExpensifyClassic',
icon: Expensicons.NewExpensify,
action: () => {
Link.openOldDotLink('inbox');
},
shouldShowRightIcon: true,
iconRight: Expensicons.NewWindow,
link: Link.buildOldDotURL('inbox'),
}, What alternative solutions did you explore? (Optional) |
@srikarparsi Huh... This is 4 days overdue. Who can take care of this? |
^ |
|
The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.4.25-10 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue: If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2024-01-24. 🎊 |
oh hold for payment |
on hold |
Was fixed here and I made sure that this is no longer reproducible. Closing this out since it was handled by an external agency which I don't believe requires payment. But if it does, please reopen this issue or tag me. |
If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email [email protected] to request to join our Slack channel!
Version Number: v1.4.14-0
Reproducible in staging?: y
Reproducible in production?: new feature
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail:
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers):
Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856
Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:
Issue reported by: Applause - Internal Team
Slack conversation:
Action Performed:
Expected Result:
The system redirects to the staging version of OldDot
Actual Result:
The system redirects to the production version of OldDot
Workaround:
Unknown
Platforms:
Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?
Screenshots/Videos
Add any screenshot/video evidence
Bug6319515_1702988818808.bandicam_2023-12-19_12-00-33-072.mp4
View all open jobs on GitHub
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: