-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[HOLD for payment 2023-06-19] [$1000] LHN logic for threads is wrong (inconsistent with other chats) #19447
Comments
Triggered auto assignment to @tjferriss ( |
Bug0 Triage Checklist (Main S/O)
|
Started looking into this. Right now we are showing the same thing for the header and the lhn which is not intended. This can be external. |
Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~01422c3862e47a029f |
Current assignee @tjferriss is eligible for the External assigner, not assigning anyone new. |
Triggered auto assignment to Contributor-plus team member for initial proposal review - @aimane-chnaif ( |
Current assignee @stitesExpensify is eligible for the External assigner, not assigning anyone new. |
ProposalPlease re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.LHN logic for threads is wrong (inconsistent with other chats) What is the root cause of that problem?This is existing logic when show LHN for a thread coming from a chatRoom App/src/components/LHNOptionsList/OptionRowLHN.js Lines 83 to 84 in a479683
That means when it's a threadReport, it gonna show the report's subtitle which is combination of policy name and reportName What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?If we want to keep it consistency with other chats. We just need to replace above line by const alternativeText = optionItem.alternateText; So it will alway renders the latest message for any report type Result: |
cc @aimane-chnaif ^ |
@aimane-chnaif @stitesExpensify what is the next step here? What do you think of @hoangzinh proposal? |
I asked confirmation here - https://github.com/Expensify/App/pull/18522/files#r1212295913 to avoid any regression. |
📣 It's been a week! Do we have any satisfactory proposals yet? Do we need to adjust the bounty for this issue? 💸 |
Makes sense to me |
📣 @hoangzinh You have been assigned to this job by @stitesExpensify! |
@aimane-chnaif @stitesExpensify PR is ready #20241. Please help me to review it. Thanks ❤️ |
|
The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.3.26-4 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue: If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2023-06-19. 🎊 After the hold period is over and BZ checklist items are completed, please complete any of the applicable payments for this issue, and check them off once done.
As a reminder, here are the bonuses/penalties that should be applied for any External issue:
|
BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:
|
@hoangzinh @aimane-chnaif I've sent you both an offer in Upworks. You're both eligible for the 50% speed bonus. @aimane-chnaif can you get started on the checklist? |
accepted offer. Thanks @tjferriss |
Everyone is hired in Upworks. We just need to complete the checklist and pay everyone out after the regression period. |
@tjferriss, @hoangzinh, @stitesExpensify, @aimane-chnaif Uh oh! This issue is overdue by 2 days. Don't forget to update your issues! |
The payments have been sent via Upworks. @aimane-chnaif can you please complete the checklist? |
I'd say the original issue was intentional and the design changed for consistency. No need to point out the offending PR. Regression Test Proposal
|
@tjferriss, @hoangzinh, @stitesExpensify, @aimane-chnaif Whoops! This issue is 2 days overdue. Let's get this updated quick! |
Regression test has been created https://github.com/Expensify/Expensify/issues/295396 |
If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email [email protected] to request to join our Slack channel!
Action Performed:
Expected Result:
The thread appears in the LHN with a preview of the message threaded, followed by the most recent message in the thread.
Actual Result:
The thread appears in the LHN with a preview of the message threaded, followed by the workspace name and room name
Workaround:
Can the user still use Expensify without this being fixed? Have you informed them of the workaround?
Platforms:
Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?
Version Number: 1.3.17.0
Reproducible in staging?: y
Reproducible in production?: y
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail:
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers):
Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856
Notes/Photos/Videos: Any additional supporting documentation
Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:
Issue reported by: @JmillsExpensify
Slack conversation: https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C049HHMV9SM/p1684503061244619
View all open jobs on GitHub
Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: