We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Switching from a Ref to a ScopedRef involves a lot of changes to how apis are called.
Ref.make(false) Ref.set(ref, true)
vs
ScopedRef.make(() => false) ScopedRef.set(ref, Effect.succeed(true))
It would be nice to standardize these so that switching from Ref to ScopedRef doesn't require dramatically changing how the different fns are called.
I don't have a strong preference one way or another about which api is better but maybe .set and .setEffect fns might be useful.
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
What is the problem this feature would solve?
Switching from a Ref to a ScopedRef involves a lot of changes to how apis are called.
vs
What is the feature you are proposing to solve the problem?
It would be nice to standardize these so that switching from Ref to ScopedRef doesn't require dramatically changing how the different fns are called.
I don't have a strong preference one way or another about which api is better but maybe .set and .setEffect fns might be useful.
What alternatives have you considered?
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: