Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CTSM-FATES v1 compsets #1047

Open
wwieder opened this issue Jun 17, 2020 · 11 comments
Open

CTSM-FATES v1 compsets #1047

wwieder opened this issue Jun 17, 2020 · 11 comments
Assignees
Labels
blocked: dependency Wait to work on this until dependency is resolved enhancement new capability or improved behavior of existing capability science Enhancement to or bug impacting science

Comments

@wwieder
Copy link
Contributor

wwieder commented Jun 17, 2020

Create working compsets for land only (I) spin-up, historical & SPP's with and w/out active crops. Also, F2000 and F_AMIP for coupled model output.

Would the compsets also define if we're using FATES-sp, FATES-fixed biogeography, FATES-dynamic biogeography.

This is linked with #1046.

@wwieder wwieder added priority: high High priority to fix/merge soon, e.g., because it is a problem in important configurations type: -discussion labels Jun 17, 2020
@ekluzek ekluzek added the blocked: dependency Wait to work on this until dependency is resolved label Jun 17, 2020
@ekluzek
Copy link
Collaborator

ekluzek commented Jun 17, 2020

This requires #1046 in order to move forward.

@ekluzek
Copy link
Collaborator

ekluzek commented Jun 17, 2020

The F compsets will need to go into CAM. So this will require a CTSM tag, CAM tag, and CESM tag to put them all together.

@billsacks billsacks removed the priority: high High priority to fix/merge soon, e.g., because it is a problem in important configurations label Jun 22, 2020
@ekluzek
Copy link
Collaborator

ekluzek commented Jul 9, 2020

These are some notes from @rosiealice on what she thought was important...

For the moment, I think the important ones to get us going are
1850
2000
Transient
SSP -something.

-As you note, FATES-CROP will need more coding work, as will FATES-SP (that's on me).
-I don't think that having CLM4.5 compsets is a big priority? Does anyone think otherwise?

-On the other details, it would be nice to have a version which is the fastest possible version - i.e. with NO glaciers, runoff, crops, etc, and then one with something more like a default configuration. People who want to run FATES with a specific river model are quite rare, I suspect.

-The no-anthro compset is mostly reelevant to the situation where we have crops working, right? Maybe we can leave that until later?

-I guess the other thing is climate forcing data? Doing that rather depends on whether we want to create the whole entire universe of FATES compsets in one go? I don't have a good handle on the implications for e.g. testing, of adding a massive number of compsets, so if people have thoughts on that please chime in...

@ekluzek
Copy link
Collaborator

ekluzek commented Sep 18, 2021

We don't have it as a compset yet, but ctsm5.1.dev056 enables the ability to do FATES-SP mode. And we also have the ability to have fixed- biogeography. So this brings in much of the functionality needed for FATES v1.

@ekluzek
Copy link
Collaborator

ekluzek commented Jan 20, 2022

As part of #1609 we'll be adding a single-point compset for FATES I1PtClm51FatesRs, which gives one of the needed compsets for FATESv1 (although it wasn't mentioned above it's still one of the needed ones).

@ekluzek
Copy link
Collaborator

ekluzek commented Jan 27, 2022

#1617 is about adding transient FATES compset aliases.

@rosiealice
Copy link
Contributor

I think we have fates compsets now, and the transient compsets are their own issue.

@samsrabin samsrabin added enhancement new capability or improved behavior of existing capability science Enhancement to or bug impacting science and removed enh - new science labels Aug 8, 2024
@ekluzek ekluzek added next this should get some attention in the next week or two. Normally each Thursday SE meeting. and removed discussion labels Aug 14, 2024
@ekluzek
Copy link
Collaborator

ekluzek commented Aug 14, 2024

Do we want this for cesm3.0?

@wwieder
Copy link
Contributor Author

wwieder commented Aug 15, 2024

Yes, for FATES sp and nocomp configurations in I cases.
(note, this was edited, as I think we want to have SP and NOCOMP options FATES cases in CLM6)

@ekluzek
Copy link
Collaborator

ekluzek commented Aug 15, 2024

We can do all of these configurations. I'm thinking definition of done here is to have compset aliases and long-names that make it easy to do all of these options. @wwieder and @rosiealice does that sound right to you?

Is fixed-biogeography the same as NOCOMP from the CESM3 compsets for CTSM?

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1nJl4lbbwBq60quyaERJ6OvVJxF4kDu4xX7zZenZgyB8

@wwieder
Copy link
Contributor Author

wwieder commented Aug 15, 2024

Let's discuss at the SE meeting, but I'm not sure these will necessarily all be possible. I also don't know if any need aliases (which at last check were being reserved for select, scientifically supported model configurations in the CESM3.0 release).

@wwieder wwieder removed the next this should get some attention in the next week or two. Normally each Thursday SE meeting. label Oct 31, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
blocked: dependency Wait to work on this until dependency is resolved enhancement new capability or improved behavior of existing capability science Enhancement to or bug impacting science
Projects
Status: No status
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants